Why it matters in the Letby case
Gill — central to the de Berk acquittal — has publicly engaged with the Letby case, arguing the statistical reasoning shows structural similarities.
September 2026: Thirlwall Inquiry final report published (15 September) — a complete failure to protect babies, 17 recommendations, and no finding on the guilt of Lucy Letby or her convictions · CCRC review continues · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.
Statistical explainer
Lucia de Berk was a Dutch nurse wrongly convicted of multiple homicides on the basis of shift-pattern statistical evidence. She was acquitted in 2010 after sustained methodological critique led by Prof. Richard Gill.
Gill — central to the de Berk acquittal — has publicly engaged with the Letby case, arguing the statistical reasoning shows structural similarities.
As in de Berk, the case connected a nurse to a cluster of adverse events through her presence on shift.
Lucia de Berk was convicted in the Netherlands on shift-pattern statistical evidence and acquitted in 2010 after sustained methodological critique led by Prof. Richard Gill. Gill has since engaged publicly with the Letby case and argues the statistical reasoning shows structural similarities.
De Berk's acquittal followed a full judicial re-examination in a different legal system. That a critique succeeded there says nothing about how the CCRC or the Court of Appeal will treat this one.
A Dutch paediatric nurse convicted of multiple murders and attempted murders, largely on statistical evidence about her presence at adverse events. She was acquitted in 2010.
Sustained methodological critique of the statistical reasoning, led by Prof. Richard Gill, which showed the original calculation was unsound.
A cluster of events, a nurse present at them, and a statistical argument built on that presence without an independently defined event set or a comparator.
Not as precedent. It is relevant as a documented instance of the same class of statistical reasoning being found unsound on re-examination.
Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.