Skip to content

April 2026: Thirlwall Inquiry final report due after Easter · CCRC still reviewing 31+ independent expert reports · Shoo Lee Panel (Feb 2025): no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts

Biography

Prof. Prakesh Shah

Professor of Paediatrics at the University of Toronto. Paediatrician-in-chief at Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto — the role Dr Shoo Lee previously held. Canadian member of the fourteen-strong Shoo Lee International Expert Panel.

Neonatology
Canada
Panel member
Last updated
3 min read

Why he matters in this case

Prof. Shah brings a specific institutional continuity to the Panel. He is Dr Shoo Lee’s successor as paediatrician-in-chief at Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto. That means Canadian neonatology’s institutional memory of the clinical frameworks the Panel is applying runs through both of them. His signature on the Panel report is not a one-off intervention by a single senior clinician; it is the continuing institutional position of one of North America’s flagship neonatal programmes.

Professional background

  • Professor of Paediatrics, University of Toronto.
  • Paediatrician-in-chief, Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto. Succeeded Dr Shoo Lee in that role.
  • Director, Canadian Neonatal Network and Canadian Preterm Birth Network — leading Canadian population-outcomes registries for extremely preterm infants.
  • Substantial peer-reviewed publication record on neonatal outcomes, neonatal epidemiology, and evidence synthesis for neonatal intensive care.

What his contribution adds

Prof. Shah’s particular contribution is the Canadian Neonatal Network data base. Much like Prof. Darlow’s ANZNN in Australia and New Zealand, the CNN is a longitudinal outcomes registry against which clusters can be measured. A Toronto neonatologist reading the Countess of Chester casebook has access to decades of baseline outcomes data for preterm infants on comparable units.

His signature alongside Dr Lee’s and Prof. Douglas Campbell’s — three senior Canadian neonatologists from one institution — demonstrates the specific institutional coherence of the Panel’s finding. This is not Dr Lee on his own looking at an old paper he wrote; it is a collective Mount Sinai / Toronto reading of the case.

Read alongside