Why it matters in the Letby case
Several Letby cases involve twins. Post-conviction expert review argues some of those cases are consistent with TTTS and surviving-twin instability after sibling death.
September 2026: Thirlwall Inquiry final report published (15 September) — a complete failure to protect babies, 17 recommendations, and no finding on the guilt of Lucy Letby or her convictions · CCRC review continues · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.
Medical explainer
Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is a complication of monochorionic twin pregnancies in which blood is shunted unequally between twins, producing instability that can persist post-delivery.
Several Letby cases involve twins. Post-conviction expert review argues some of those cases are consistent with TTTS and surviving-twin instability after sibling death.
Several indicted cases involve twins, and the Crown attributed their deteriorations to deliberate harm rather than to shared placental pathology.
Post-conviction review argues some of those cases are consistent with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and with the instability a surviving twin experiences after a sibling's death — both recognised complications of monochorionic twin pregnancy.
TTTS is diagnosed antenatally and by placental examination. Where that evidence was not gathered at the time, the argument rests on the clinical picture being consistent with it rather than on a confirmed diagnosis.
A complication of monochorionic (shared-placenta) twin pregnancy in which blood is unequally shared between the twins through connecting placental vessels, leaving one over- and one under-perfused.
Because the shared circulation means the death of one twin can cause an acute haemodynamic change in the survivor. This is a recognised phenomenon, not a rare curiosity.
The post-conviction argument is that the clinical picture in some cases is consistent with it, and that the obstetric evidence needed to test that was largely absent from the trial.
No. It is offered as a differential for some, not as a general explanation.
Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.