Why it matters in the Letby case
Referral is not release. The procedural path from referral to outcome takes months and depends on the volume of new evidence.
July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.
Legal explainer
A CCRC referral triggers a fresh hearing before the Court of Appeal Criminal Division. The Court hears the new evidence, applies the unsafe-conviction test under s.2 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, and may quash, order a retrial, or uphold.
Referral is not release. The procedural path from referral to outcome takes months and depends on the volume of new evidence.
Unless and until a court rules otherwise, the convictions stand and Letby remains subject to fifteen whole-life orders.
The applicant's case is that a referral would put the post-conviction expert material before the Court of Appeal for the first time.
Referral is not release, and the path from referral to outcome takes months and depends on the volume of new evidence. Nothing about the timetable is published in advance.
The case goes to the Court of Appeal Criminal Division for a fresh hearing. It is treated as an appeal, and the Court applies the unsafe-conviction test under section 2 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968.
No. The conviction stands unless and until the Court quashes it.
Months rather than weeks, and longer where the volume of new expert evidence is large. No timetable is published in advance.
The Court may quash the conviction, quash it and order a retrial, or uphold it.
Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.