Skip to content

April 2026: Thirlwall Inquiry final report due after Easter · CCRC still reviewing 31+ independent expert reports · Shoo Lee Panel (Feb 2025): no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Inquiry witness evidence — summary + excerpts
·Dr Stephen Brearey; Thirlwall Inquiry

Dr Stephen Brearey — witness evidence summary (Thirlwall Inquiry)

Summary and key excerpts from the Thirlwall Inquiry witness evidence of Dr Stephen Brearey — the lead consultant who first raised concerns about the cluster of deaths on the Countess of Chester neonatal unit from July 2015 onwards. Sets out the sequence in which consultants escalated to management, the executive response, and the year-plus delay before police were contacted.

Last updated

Licence: Open Government Licence v3.0

Original source: thirlwall.inquiry.gov.uk

Mirrored on this site:

Crown Copyright. Mirrored under the Open Government Licence v3.0 with attribution.

Context

Dr Stephen Brearey was the lead consultant on the Countess of Chester neonatal unit and the first clinician to raise concerns, from July 2015 onwards, about the cluster of unexpected deaths and collapses. He kept contemporaneous notes of meetings with management and of his escalation attempts throughout 2016 and 2017. His Thirlwall Inquiry witness evidence is one of the most important single records of how consultant concerns were handled by the Trust’s executive team.

Key passages

Dr Stephen Brearey

I first raised concerns in July 2015. I can be specific about that because I noted it at the time. The pattern I was seeing was not a pattern of natural deterioration that I recognised from my training or from my earlier career on this unit.
Thirlwall Inquiry witness evidence, Autumn 2024

Dr Stephen Brearey

My recollection — and the notes I kept at the time support this — is that the response from senior management was one of irritation. I was repeatedly told that this was an HR issue, a team-dynamics issue, a dispute between nurses and doctors. It was none of those things. It was a patient-safety issue.
Thirlwall Inquiry — on the executive response

Dr Stephen Brearey

I believed then, and I believe now, that the police should have been contacted by September 2016 at the latest. It was not a difficult call. We had a serial pattern. Police were contacted in May 2017. I do not know how else to explain that delay except in terms of the executive team wanting to avoid reputational harm.
Thirlwall Inquiry — on the police referral

Dr Stephen Brearey

I was asked — I was, in truth, instructed — to sign a letter apologising to the nurse in question. I did sign it, to my continuing regret. I signed it because I was told in clear terms that if I did not, my own position on the unit was in jeopardy.
Thirlwall Inquiry — on being asked to apologise

What to read alongside this

See our pages on Tony Chambers, Ian Harvey, and the September 2016 consultants’ letter. The timeline tracks the escalation month by month.

Related on this site

Attribution and licence

Contains public-sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Original source: thirlwall.inquiry.gov.uk . Mirrored on this site on 2026-04-21.